
We make it legible to the people who fund it, buy it, and use it, and we build the foundation underneath so it holds as you grow.
Focused programs. No retainers. Permanent ownership.
An investor without your domain background forms a view before your deck loads. A procurement committee judges what they can see, not what you know. An operator has to trust the output without understanding how it was built. The science has not changed. But the distance between what you have built and how it reads to the people who decide about it is starting to cost you, in ways that are hard to name directly.
Most design work creates ongoing dependency. We work differently. One program, a defined end date, and everything owned by your team when we leave.
Step 1
Listen and map
We talk to the people who decide about your technology, not only the people who built it. No designing before the problem is named.
Step 2
Build
Brand, narrative, system, product. Whatever the program covers, built to hold as you grow.
Step 3
Hand over
Everything owned by your team. Training included. Then we leave.
Biotech. Climate and energy. Space. Robotics. Quantum and deep compute. Companies whose technology is genuinely hard to understand from outside, where the people who buy it are not the people who use it, and where the future depends on decisions made by people without direct access to the science.
If that sounds like you:
(01)
A brand and narrative that make your technology legible to the people who decide about it
(02)
A design foundation built for your product, not a generic template
(03)
A live website and product your team owns and runs without us
(04)
A system that holds together as you scale, so nothing gets rebuilt at the next stage
Mistaek
Brand, system, and product in one engagement
Built to hold as you scale
Fixed scope, fixed price, fixed end date
You own everything permanently
Brand Studios
Brand, then you are on your own
Rebuilt at the next stage of growth
Open-ended, or a retainer
Ongoing dependency
Two programs. Choose by where you are, not by assembling parts.
Open (featured)
Your technology becomes legible to the people who decide about it.
32k €
8 weeks | 40% to start, 30% at design sign-off, 30% at launch.
What you’ll get
Workshops with your team, users, and buyers
Brand, narrative, positioning, and an investor and sales deck
Visual identity and a UI foundation built as a system
A website designed and shipped, five page templates
Everything owned by your team, documented and permanent
Hold
It holds together as you scale.
48k €
12 weeks | 30% to start, 40% at the system build, 30% at handoff.
What you’ll get
Full audit and gap analysis
A complete design system with documentation and governance
Key product flows rebuilt on the system
DesignOps and training, plus a 30-day adoption check
Everything owned by your team, permanent
Compare Open to a senior designer at €60,000 a year plus employment costs, who takes three to four months to reach this point and leaves with the knowledge. Or a brand studio that stops at brand, after which the work is rebuilt at the next stage of scale.
Additional page, designed and developed
1.500 €
Additional workshop session
1.200 €
Additional deck
2.500 €
Extra revision round
1.000 €
The door is there. Let's open it.
If your technology is harder to explain than it is to build, let's talk. We will tell you honestly whether a program makes sense for where you are.